The four exponentials conjecture
Let $x_1, x_2$ be complex numbers that are linearly independent over $\mathbb{Q}$, and let $y_1, y_2$ be as well. Then at least one of the four numbers $e^{x_i y_j}$, $i, j \in \{1, 2\}$, is transcendental.
Source: Th. Schneider, Einführung in die transzendenten Zahlen (1957); stated explicitly by Lang (1966) and Ramachandra, Acta Arith. 14 (1968).
Classification
- Primary
- NT — Number Theory
- Keywords
- exponential function, transcendental numbers
References
@book{schneider1957,
author = {Schneider, Theodor},
title = {Einf{\"u}hrung in die transzendenten Zahlen},
publisher = {Springer},
year = {1957}
}
@book{lang1966,
author = {Lang, Serge},
title = {Introduction to Transcendental Numbers},
publisher = {Addison-Wesley},
year = {1966}
}
@article{ramachandra1968,
author = {Ramachandra, K.},
title = {Contributions to the theory of transcendental numbers},
journal = {Acta Arithmetica},
volume = {14},
year = {1968}
}
@misc{wikipedia,
title = {Four exponentials conjecture},
howpublished = {Wikipedia},
url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_exponentials_conjecture}
}
@misc{formalconjectures,
author = {{The Formal Conjectures Authors}},
title = {Formal Conjectures},
url = {https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/0771383387505c96d1b2f6a3d35088ad00892c5c/FormalConjectures/Wikipedia/Exponentials.lean#L32},
note = {Lean statement under Apache-2.0; problem text under CC BY 4.0, or CC BY-SA 4.0 where it is based on Wikipedia}
}
Canonical Lean statement
A submission resolves this problem by proving the constant Problem_OP_00013.
/-- OP-00013: The four exponentials conjecture -/
def Problem_OP_00013 : Prop :=
∀ (x y : Fin 2 → ℂ),
LinearIndependent ℚ x → LinearIndependent ℚ y → ∃ i j, Transcendental ℚ (Complex.exp (x i * y j))
Formalised by The Formal Conjectures Authors (Apache-2.0); reviewed by clemens-admin.
Available to match against in: Lean v4.33.1 with Mathlib v4.33.1.
Resolving this problem in Lean
Add the problems package as a dependency, import this problem's module, and prove the constant. Any published revision works.
In lakefile.toml:
[[require]] name = "RegistryProblems" git = "https://github.com/cthalhammer/registry-problems" rev = "<published revision>"
In your proof:
import RegistryProblems.OP_00013 theorem resolution : RegistryProblems.Problem_OP_00013 := by sorry
In preprint.toml, mapping the claim to the declaration that establishes it:
[[statements]] label = "Theorem 1" lean = "resolution" latex = "..." problem = "OP-00013" claim = "full"
To disprove it instead, prove the negation and claim "disproof", or "counterexample" if the proof exhibits one:
theorem disproof : ¬ RegistryProblems.Problem_OP_00013 := by sorry
You can also write the statement out in full; the verifier checks it matches up to definitional equality. Partial results and reductions are not matched against this statement.
Citing this problem
This identifier is permanent. It will not change if the problem is solved, reclassified or withdrawn.
OP-00013, "The four exponentials conjecture", clopen.solutions.