clopen.solutions
OP-00705 Solution claimed

Polynomial sample complexity for deletion-trace reconstruction

Submit a result

Fix a known deletion probability $q \in (0,1)$. A trace of an unknown string $x \in \{0,1\}^n$ of known length $n$ is obtained by deleting each bit independently with probability $q$ and concatenating the retained bits in their original order; the deleted positions are not reported. Write $D_q(x)$ for the law of a trace, a distribution on the binary strings of length at most $n$, the empty string included. A decoder $A_{n,q}$ maps $m$ traces to $\{0,1\}^n$; it may use its own randomness, its computation is unrestricted, and it must be the same for every string of length $n$. For fixed $q$, Chase proved that recovering every string requires $\Omega(n^{3/2}/\log^7 n)$ traces, and that $\exp(\tilde O(n^{1/5}))$ traces suffice; Burudgunte, Valiant and Wang proved that a quasipolynomial number of traces suffices.

Problem. For every fixed $q \in (0,1)$, do there exist finite constants $C_q, k_q > 0$ such that, for every $n \ge 2$, some decoder $A_{n,q}$ using $m \le \lceil C_q n^{k_q} \rceil$ independent traces satisfies $$\inf_{x \in \{0,1\}^n} \Pr\bigl[A_{n,q}(Y_1, \dots, Y_m) = x\bigr] \ge \frac23, \qquad Y_1, \dots, Y_m \overset{\mathrm{iid}}{\sim} D_q(x)?$$ The probability includes the decoder's randomness and all deletions.

Source: A long-standing question in trace reconstruction, whether polynomially many traces suffice at constant deletion probability (see Aamand, Liu and Narayanan (2025), abstract); stated in this form by AIM — Open Applied Problems.

Imported from github.com/MColbrook/AIM.

Classification

Primary
PR — Probability
Secondary
IT, ST
Keywords
AIM Open Applied Problems, deletion channel, sample complexity, trace reconstruction

References

@inproceedings{aamand2025,
  author        = {Aamand, Anders and Liu, Allen and Narayanan, Shyam},
  title         = {Near-Optimal Trace Reconstruction for Mildly Separated Strings},
  booktitle     = {52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  series        = {LIPIcs},
  volume        = {334},
  year          = {2025},
  pages         = {3:1--3:20},
  doi           = {10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.3},
  eprint        = {2411.18765},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
}
@article{chase2021lower,
  author        = {Chase, Zachary},
  title         = {New lower bounds for trace reconstruction},
  journal       = {Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar{\'e} Probab. Stat.},
  volume        = {57},
  number        = {2},
  year          = {2021},
  pages         = {627--643},
  doi           = {10.1214/20-AIHP1089},
  eprint        = {1905.03031},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
}
@inproceedings{chase2021upper,
  author    = {Chase, Zachary},
  title     = {Separating words and trace reconstruction},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2021)},
  publisher = {ACM},
  year      = {2021},
  pages     = {21--31},
  doi       = {10.1145/3406325.3451118},
}
@misc{burudgunte2026,
  author        = {Burudgunte, Arnav and Valiant, Paul and Wang, Hongao},
  title         = {Quasipolynomial Trace Reconstruction},
  year          = {2026},
  eprint        = {2607.04073},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
}
@misc{aim-polynomial-trace-reconstruction,
  author       = {Brunton, Steve and Colbrook, Matthew J. and de Hoop, Maarten V. and Stepaniants, George and Townsend, Alex and Ward, Rachel},
  title        = {{Polynomial sample complexity for deletion-trace reconstruction}},
  howpublished = {AIM --- Open Applied Problems, GitHub repository},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://github.com/MColbrook/AIM/blob/1b7c7fd251c1643bb41f0e3cef38704bcef410fd/problems/321-polynomial-trace-reconstruction.md},
  note         = {Entry 321 at commit 1b7c7fd, 2026-10-13},
}

Resolution claims

OpenAI

Exact worst-case reconstruction of a binary word from independent deletion traces requires $n^{\Omega(\log\log n)}$ samples for every fixed deletion probability $q\in(0,1)$, even with unrestricted computation and any fixed positive success probability. This gives a negative answer to the polynomial-sample question for binary trace reconstruction. More generally, when $q^3\log n\to\infty$, we prove a lower bound of $n^{c\log(q^3\log n)}$ samples for every …

Disproof · not verified · fidelity not established · posted on GitHub 6 Oct 2026

Status history

WhenChangeByReason
2026-10-16 Needs verification → Solution claimed — Recorded here: math @ 1581d4c, build/main.tex.

Citing this problem

This identifier is permanent. It will not change if the problem is solved, reclassified or withdrawn.

OP-00705, "Polynomial sample complexity for deletion-trace reconstruction", clopen.solutions.