clopen.solutions
OP-01028 Partially resolved

The Erdős–Moser problem: a large subset avoiding its own restricted sums in A

Submit a result

Let $A \subset \mathbb{Z}$ be a set of $n$ integers, and for $S \subset A$ let $S \hat{+} S = \{s_1 + s_2 : s_1, s_2 \in S,\ s_1 \ne s_2\}$ be its restricted sumset. Sanders proved that some $S$ with $S \hat{+} S$ disjoint from $A$ has $|S| \ge (\log n)^{1 + c}$ for an absolute $c > 0$, and Beker gave another proof with any $c < \frac{1}{68}$. In the other direction, Ruzsa showed that one cannot in general take $|S|$ larger than $e^{C\sqrt{\log n}}$.

Problem. Is there a set $S \subset A$ with $|S| = (\log n)^{100}$ such that $S \hat{+} S$ is disjoint from $A$?

Source: P. Erdős and L. Moser; recorded in P. Erdős, Extremal problems in number theory, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 8 (1965). Listed as Problem 2 in B. Green, 100 open problems (version of January 2026).

Imported from people.maths.ox.ac.uk/greenbj/papers/open-problems.pdf.

Classification

Primary
NT — Number Theory
Secondary
CO
Keywords
additive combinatorics, Erdős–Moser problem, restricted sumsets, sum-free sets

References

@inproceedings{erdos1965extremal,
  author = {Erd{\H o}s, P.},
  title = {Extremal problems in number theory},
  booktitle = {Theory of Numbers},
  series = {Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics},
  volume = {8},
  pages = {181--189},
  publisher = {American Mathematical Society},
  year = {1965}
}

@article{sanders2021erdosmoser,
  author = {Sanders, Tom},
  title = {The {E}rd{\H o}s--{M}oser sum-free set problem},
  journal = {Canadian Journal of Mathematics},
  volume = {73},
  number = {1},
  pages = {63--107},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.4153/S0008414X1900049X}
}

@article{ruzsa2005sumavoiding,
  author = {Ruzsa, Imre Z.},
  title = {Sum-avoiding subsets},
  journal = {The Ramanujan Journal},
  volume = {9},
  number = {1-2},
  pages = {77--82},
  year = {2005},
  doi = {10.1007/s11139-005-0826-4}
}

@article{beker2026erdosmoser,
  author = {Beker, Adrian},
  title = {The {E}rd{\H o}s--{M}oser sum-free set problem via improved bounds for $k$-configurations},
  journal = {International Mathematics Research Notices},
  volume = {2026},
  number = {20},
  pages = {rnag235},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.1093/imrn/rnag235},
  eprint = {2501.10203},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv}
}

@misc{zhi2026branch,
  author = {Zhi, Yao},
  title = {Branch-sensitive density increments for $k$-configurations},
  year = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.03750},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv}
}

@misc{green100open,
  author = {Green, Ben},
  title = {100 open problems},
  howpublished = {\url{https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/greenbj/papers/open-problems.pdf}},
  note = {Problem 2; version of January 2026, most recent update December 2025},
  year = {2026}
}

Resolution claims

Yao Zhi

We refine the density-increment argument for $k$-configurations developed by Beker. The point is not to introduce a new inverse theorem, but to retain information that is lost when the graph-counting output is compressed into a single uniform alternative. For the transitive $K_k$ appearing in the $k$-configuration problem we keep a fixed moment throughout the graph recursion and obtain three genuinely …

Partial resolution · not verified · fidelity not established · posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026

Status history

WhenChangeByReason
2026-10-29 Open → Partially resolved The registry's curators Branch-Sensitive Density Increments for $k$-Configurations v1 recorded from arXiv:2610.03750v1.

Citing this problem

This identifier is permanent. It will not change if the problem is solved, reclassified or withdrawn.

OP-01028, "The Erdős–Moser problem: a large subset avoiding its own restricted sums in A", clopen.solutions.